[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251223164652.6153a392@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 16:46:52 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Trace Kernel
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Do not register unsupported perf events
On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 10:22:18 -0800
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> > index a5a93d243047..754b14ca87a7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> > @@ -710,6 +710,8 @@ int trace_event_reg(struct trace_event_call *call,
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> > case TRACE_REG_PERF_REGISTER:
> > + if (!call->class->perf_probe)
> > + return -ENODEV;
Thanks Namhyung (and Jiri), but this actually already made it upstream as
it was a bug fix and I wanted to get it into the next rc release (rc2).
But, the real fix is having perf be able to handle synthetic_events as real
events.
Can you please review this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20251217113920.50b56246@gandalf.local.home/
I plan on queuing that for the next merge window.
Thanks,
-- Steve
> > return tracepoint_probe_register(call->tp,
> > call->class->perf_probe,
> > call);
> > --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists