linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ima: Fix stack-out-of-bounds in is_bprm_creds_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3aeed1ff9388f09555bf5c6ade03cbe9ce93ff14.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 16:58:26 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Chris J Arges <carges@...udflare.com>, roberto.sassu@...wei.com
Cc: kernel-team@...udflare.com, Dmitry Kasatkin
 <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
        Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge
 E. Hallyn"	 <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Mickaël Salaün
 <mic@...ikod.net>,
        Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ima: Fix stack-out-of-bounds in
 is_bprm_creds_for_exec()

Hi Chris,

On Sun, 2025-12-21 at 12:01 -0600, Chris J Arges wrote:
> KASAN reported a stack-out-of-bounds access in ima_appraise_measurement
> from is_bprm_creds_for_exec:
> 
> BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in ima_appraise_measurement+0x12dc/0x16a0
>  Read of size 1 at addr ffffc9000160f940 by task sudo/550
> The buggy address belongs to stack of task sudo/550
> and is located at offset 24 in frame:
>   ima_appraise_measurement+0x0/0x16a0
> This frame has 2 objects:
>   [48, 56) 'file'
>   [80, 148) 'hash'
> 
> This is caused by using container_of on the *file pointer. This offset
> calculation is what triggers the stack-out-of-bounds error.
> 
> In order to fix this, pass in a bprm_is_check boolean which can be set
> depending on how process_measurement is called. If the caller has a
> linux_binprm pointer and the function is BPRM_CHECK we can determine
> is_check and set it then. Otherwise set it to false.
> 
> Fixes: 95b3cdafd7cb7 ("ima: instantiate the bprm_creds_for_exec() hook")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris J Arges <carges@...udflare.com>

Thank you!  I'd appreciate your limiting the line lengths to 80 chars (e.g.
scripts/checkpatch.pl --max-line-length=80).

-- 
thanks,

Mimi