linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-oneplus: Update firmware paths

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <vif3wnb5zbfsz6hpy3fcesiuav2hcc2cwflnzxjk67ysfiuwfj@sktqfukjjuog>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 00:07:26 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: david@...t.cz, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-oneplus: Update firmware
 paths

On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 01:01:42AM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On 12/23/2025 12:35 AM, David Heidelberg via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
> > 
> > Conform to the new firmware path scheme.
> > Includes cosmetic cleanups.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
> > ---
> >  .../arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi
> > index db6dd04c51bb5..f1c63794db979 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi
> > @@ -181,8 +181,9 @@ panel_vddi_poc_1p8: panel-vddi-poc-regulator {
> >  };
> >  
> >  &adsp_pas {
> > +	firmware-name = "qcom/sdm845/OnePlus/enchilada/adsp.mbn";
> > +
> >  	status = "okay";
> > -	firmware-name = "qcom/sdm845/oneplus6/adsp.mbn";
> >  };
> >  
> >  &apps_rsc {
> > @@ -353,8 +354,9 @@ vreg_s3c_0p6: smps3 {
> >  };
> >  
> >  &cdsp_pas {
> > +	firmware-name = "qcom/sdm845/OnePlus/enchilada/cdsp.mbn";
> > +
> >  	status = "okay";
> > -	firmware-name = "qcom/sdm845/oneplus6/cdsp.mbn";
> >  };
> >  
> >  &gcc {
> > @@ -370,7 +372,7 @@ &gpu {
> >  };
> >  
> >  &gpu_zap_shader {
> > -	firmware-name = "qcom/sdm845/oneplus6/a630_zap.mbn";
> > +	firmware-name = "qcom/sdm845/OnePlus/enchilada/a630_zap.mbn";
> 
> I believe this is considered as breaking backward compatibility. How
> about creating a symlink in linux-firmware instead.

OnePlus is not supported in linux-firmware.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry