[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <256da54b-519f-461d-9586-10b26ef7568e@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 14:54:36 +0900
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>, zyjzyj2000@...il.com, jgg@...pe.ca,
leon@...nel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Avoid -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end
warnings
On 12/23/25 14:44, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>
> 在 2025/12/22 21:34, Gustavo A. R. Silva 写道:
>>
>>>>>>> V2->V3: Replace struct ib_sge with struct rxe_sge
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What are you doing?
>>>>>
>>>>> Because struct rxe_sge differs from struct ib_sge, I aligned it to use the same structure.
>>>>
>>>> Listen, this is not how things are done upstream. Read what I previously commented:
>>>>
>>>>>> You're making a mess of this whole thing. Please, don't make changes
>>>>>> to my patches on your own.
>>>>
>>>> and please, learn how to properly submit patch series.
>>>>
>>>> Lastly, do the changes that you want/need to implement in your code, and don't
>>>> submit my patch as part of those changes again.
>>>
>>> You can correct this patch by yourself.
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/ad8987ae-b7fe-47af-a1d2-5055749011c0@embeddedor.com/
>
> You need to do some changes in your commit.
This is what you haven't understood yet. If the original code is wrong (e.g. is
currently using struct ib_sge instead of struct rxe_sge or the other way around),
then _that_ code should be fixed _first_, regardless of any other patch that might
be applied on top of it.
-Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists