lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251223085447.139301-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 16:54:47 +0800
From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...weicloud.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
	Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>,
	Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@...il.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: arm64: Fix panic due to missing BTI at indirect jump targets

From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>

When BTI is enabled, the indirect jump selftest triggers BTI exception:

Internal error: Oops - BTI: 0000000036000003 [#1]  SMP
...
Call trace:
 bpf_prog_2e5f1c71c13ac3e0_big_jump_table+0x54/0xf8 (P)
 bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu+0x140/0x464
 bpf_prog_test_run_syscall+0x274/0x3ac
 bpf_prog_test_run+0x224/0x2b0
 __sys_bpf+0x4cc/0x5c8
 __arm64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x94
 invoke_syscall+0x78/0x20c
 el0_svc_common+0x11c/0x1c0
 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58
 el0_svc+0x54/0x19c
 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0x12c
 el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c

This happens because no BTI instruction is generated by the JIT for
indirect jump targets.

Fix it by emitting BTI instruction for every possible indirect jump
targets when BTI is enabled. The targets are identified by traversing
all instruction arrays of jump table type used by the BPF program,
since indirect jump targets can only be read from instruction arrays
of jump table type.

Fixes: f4a66cf1cb14 ("bpf: arm64: Add support for indirect jumps")
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>
---
v2:
- Exclude instruction arrays not used for indirect jumps (Anton Protopopov)

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251127140318.3944249-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com/
---
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 20 +++++++++++
 include/linux/bpf.h           | 19 +++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/bpf_insn_array.c   | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c         |  6 ++++
 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 0c4d44bcfbf4..f08f0f9fa04e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ static const int bpf2a64[] = {
 
 struct jit_ctx {
 	const struct bpf_prog *prog;
+	unsigned long *indirect_targets;
 	int idx;
 	int epilogue_offset;
 	int *offset;
@@ -1199,6 +1200,11 @@ static int add_exception_handler(const struct bpf_insn *insn,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool is_indirect_target(int insn_off, unsigned long *targets_bitmap)
+{
+	return targets_bitmap && test_bit(insn_off, targets_bitmap);
+}
+
 /* JITs an eBPF instruction.
  * Returns:
  * 0  - successfully JITed an 8-byte eBPF instruction.
@@ -1231,6 +1237,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx,
 	int ret;
 	bool sign_extend;
 
+	if (is_indirect_target(i, ctx->indirect_targets))
+		emit_bti(A64_BTI_J, ctx);
+
 	switch (code) {
 	/* dst = src */
 	case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_X:
@@ -2085,6 +2094,16 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx));
 	ctx.prog = prog;
 
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL) && bpf_prog_has_jump_table(prog)) {
+		ctx.indirect_targets = kvcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(prog->len), sizeof(unsigned long),
+						GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (ctx.indirect_targets == NULL) {
+			prog = orig_prog;
+			goto out_off;
+		}
+		bpf_prog_collect_indirect_targets(prog, ctx.indirect_targets);
+	}
+
 	ctx.offset = kvcalloc(prog->len + 1, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (ctx.offset == NULL) {
 		prog = orig_prog;
@@ -2248,6 +2267,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 			prog->aux->priv_stack_ptr = NULL;
 		}
 		kvfree(ctx.offset);
+		kvfree(ctx.indirect_targets);
 out_priv_stack:
 		kfree(jit_data);
 		prog->aux->jit_data = NULL;
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index da6a00dd313f..a3a89d4b4dae 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -3875,13 +3875,32 @@ void bpf_insn_array_release(struct bpf_map *map);
 void bpf_insn_array_adjust(struct bpf_map *map, u32 off, u32 len);
 void bpf_insn_array_adjust_after_remove(struct bpf_map *map, u32 off, u32 len);
 
+enum bpf_insn_array_type {
+	BPF_INSN_ARRAY_VOID,
+	BPF_INSN_ARRAY_JUMP_TABLE,
+};
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
 void bpf_prog_update_insn_ptrs(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 *offsets, void *image);
+void bpf_prog_collect_indirect_targets(const struct bpf_prog *prog, unsigned long *bitmap);
+void bpf_prog_set_insn_array_type(struct bpf_map *map, int type);
+bool bpf_prog_has_jump_table(const struct bpf_prog *prog);
 #else
 static inline void
 bpf_prog_update_insn_ptrs(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 *offsets, void *image)
 {
 }
+static inline void
+bpf_prog_collect_indirect_targets(const struct bpf_prog *prog, unsigned long *bitmap)
+{
+}
+static inline void bpf_prog_set_insn_array_type(struct bpf_map *map, int type)
+{
+}
+static inline bool bpf_prog_has_jump_table(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	return false;
+}
 #endif
 
 static inline int bpf_map_check_op_flags(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, u64 allowed_flags)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_insn_array.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_insn_array.c
index c96630cb75bf..fbffc865feab 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_insn_array.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_insn_array.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 
 struct bpf_insn_array {
 	struct bpf_map map;
+	int type;
 	atomic_t used;
 	long *ips;
 	DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct bpf_insn_array_value, values);
@@ -159,6 +160,17 @@ static bool is_insn_array(const struct bpf_map *map)
 	return map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_INSN_ARRAY;
 }
 
+static bool is_jump_table(const struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+	struct bpf_insn_array *insn_array;
+
+	if (!is_insn_array(map))
+		return false;
+
+	insn_array = cast_insn_array(map);
+	return insn_array->type == BPF_INSN_ARRAY_JUMP_TABLE;
+}
+
 static inline bool valid_offsets(const struct bpf_insn_array *insn_array,
 				 const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
@@ -302,3 +314,54 @@ void bpf_prog_update_insn_ptrs(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 *offsets, void *image)
 		}
 	}
 }
+
+bool bpf_prog_has_jump_table(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < prog->aux->used_map_cnt; i++) {
+		if (is_jump_table(prog->aux->used_maps[i]))
+			return true;
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function collects possible indirect jump targets in a BPF program. Since indirect jump
+ * targets can only be read from indirect arrays used as jump table, it traverses all jump
+ * tables used by @prog. For each instruction found in the jump tables, it sets the corresponding
+ * bit in @bitmap.
+ */
+void bpf_prog_collect_indirect_targets(const struct bpf_prog *prog, unsigned long *bitmap)
+{
+	struct bpf_insn_array *insn_array;
+	struct bpf_map *map;
+	u32 xlated_off;
+	int i, j;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < prog->aux->used_map_cnt; i++) {
+		map = prog->aux->used_maps[i];
+		if (!is_jump_table(map))
+			continue;
+
+		insn_array = cast_insn_array(map);
+		for (j = 0; j < map->max_entries; j++) {
+			xlated_off = insn_array->values[j].xlated_off;
+			if (xlated_off == INSN_DELETED)
+				continue;
+			if (xlated_off < prog->aux->subprog_start)
+				continue;
+			xlated_off -= prog->aux->subprog_start;
+			if (xlated_off >= prog->len)
+				continue;
+			__set_bit(xlated_off, bitmap);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+void bpf_prog_set_insn_array_type(struct bpf_map *map, int type)
+{
+	struct bpf_insn_array *insn_array = cast_insn_array(map);
+
+	insn_array->type = type;
+}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index d6b8a77fbe3b..ee6f4ddfbb79 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -20288,6 +20288,12 @@ static int check_indirect_jump(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *in
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Explicitly mark this map as a jump table such that it can be
+	 * distinguished later from other instruction arrays
+	 */
+	bpf_prog_set_insn_array_type(map, BPF_INSN_ARRAY_JUMP_TABLE);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < n - 1; i++) {
 		other_branch = push_stack(env, env->gotox_tmp_buf->items[i],
 					  env->insn_idx, env->cur_state->speculative);
-- 
2.47.3


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ