linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] mm/hugetlb: ignore hugepage kernel args if hugepages are unsupported

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251223013045.4579-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 17:30:44 -0800
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>,
	"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
	Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mm/hugetlb: ignore hugepage kernel args if hugepages are unsupported

On Sun, 21 Dec 2025 10:49:07 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 21 Dec 2025 10:22:44 +0100 "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > > 
> > > My main concern was -
> > > A fixes tag means it might get auto backported to stable kernels too,
> > 
> > Not in the MM world -- IIRC. I think there is the agreement, that we 
> > decide what should go into stable and what not.
> > 
> > Andrew can correct me if my memory is wrong.
> 
> Yes, -stable maintainers have been asked to only backport patches where
> the MM developers asked for that, with cc:stable.  There may be
> slipups, but as far as I know this is working.
> 
> I don't actually know how they determine which patches need this
> special treatment.  Pathname?  Signed-off-by:akpm?

I guess it is pathname, based on ignore_list file [1] of stable-queue repo.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/ignore_list#n16


Thanks,
SJ

[...]