[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251223112647.00001ebf@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 11:26:47 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Bjorn
Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, Srinivas Pandruvada
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.1 7/8] ACPI: bus: Adjust feature mask creation for
\_SB._OSC
On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 20:23:29 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> The feature mask creation for \_SB._OSC is messy and hard to follow,
> so clean it up and make all of the CPPC-related features depend on
> CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB as they will not work if it is not set anyway.
>
> Also make acpi_bus_osc_negotiate_platform_control() print a message
> including a bit mask representig the features for which control has
> been granted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2.1:
> * Print one more message including the initial feature mask before processing.
> * Add R-by from Jonathan (assuming it still applies).
FWIW the extra message makes sense to me. So RB definitely still applies.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists