[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab4cd403f47438a1bd1efee45b006b755560e5e6@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 13:16:46 +0000
From: "Zqiang" <qiang.zhang@...ux.dev>
To: "Andrea Righi" <arighi@...dia.com>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, void@...ifault.com, changwoo@...lia.com,
sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Avoid multiple irq_work_queue() calls in
destroy_dsq()
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 07:53:18PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
>
> >
> > This commit only make irq_work_queue() to be called when the
> > llist_add() returns true.
> >
> Just to be more clear, we could rephrase the commit message as follows:
>
> llist_add() returns true only when adding to an empty list, which indicates
> that no IRQ work is currently queued or running. Therefore, we only need to
> call irq_work_queue() when llist_add() returns true, to avoid unnecessarily
> re-queueing IRQ work that is already pending or executing.
Thank you for make the commit more clear and reviewed :) .
Thanks
Zqiang
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@...ux.dev>
> >
> But overall, looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
>
> Thanks,
> -Andrea
>
> >
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/ext.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> > index 8f6d8d7f895c..136b01950a62 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> > @@ -3439,8 +3439,8 @@ static void destroy_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, u64 dsq_id)
> > * operations inside scheduler locks.
> > */
> > dsq->id = SCX_DSQ_INVALID;
> > - llist_add(&dsq->free_node, &dsqs_to_free);
> > - irq_work_queue(&free_dsq_irq_work);
> > + if (llist_add(&dsq->free_node, &dsqs_to_free))
> > + irq_work_queue(&free_dsq_irq_work);
> >
> > out_unlock_dsq:
> > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dsq->lock, flags);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists