linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 11/31] clk: at91: clk-usb: add support for clk_parent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cb19cd94-7f81-4f75-a7db-bf25192986ed@tuxon.dev>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 16:00:49 +0200
From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To: Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
 alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Varshini.Rajendran@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/31] clk: at91: clk-usb: add support for
 clk_parent_data



On 12/18/25 18:23, Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com wrote:
> On 10/20/25 12:17, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> Hi, Ryan,
>>
>> On 9/19/25 00:15, Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com wrote:
>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
>>>
>>> Add support for clk_parent_data in usb clock driver.
>>>
>>> All the SoC based drivers that rely on clk-usb were adapted
>>> to the new API change. The switch itself for SoCs will be done
>>> in subsequent patches.
>>>
>>> Remove the use of __clk_get_hw() for the slow clocks.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
>>> [ryan.wanner@...rochip: Add SAMA7D65 and SAM9X75 SoCs to the changes.
>>> Change how the main_xtal and slcks are initialized so they match the
>>> parent_data API]
>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/clk/at91/at91rm9200.c  |  2 +-
>>>   drivers/clk/at91/at91sam9260.c |  2 +-
>>>   drivers/clk/at91/at91sam9g45.c |  2 +-
>>>   drivers/clk/at91/at91sam9n12.c |  2 +-
>>>   drivers/clk/at91/at91sam9x5.c  |  2 +-
>>>   drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c     | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>   drivers/clk/at91/dt-compat.c   |  6 ++---
>>>   drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h         | 11 +++++----
>>>   drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c     |  2 +-
>>>   drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c      | 21 +++++++++--------
>>>   drivers/clk/at91/sama5d2.c     |  2 +-
>>>   drivers/clk/at91/sama5d3.c     |  2 +-
>>>   drivers/clk/at91/sama5d4.c     |  2 +-
>>>   drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c    | 24 +++++++++++---------
>>>   14 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>>> @@ -882,10 +885,10 @@ static void __init sam9x7_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
>>>
>>>        sam9x7_pmc->chws[PMC_MCK] = hw;
>>>
>>> -     parent_names[0] = "plla_divpmcck";
>>> -     parent_names[1] = "upll_divpmcck";
>>> -     parent_names[2] = "main_osc";
>>> -     usbck_hw = sam9x60_clk_register_usb(regmap, "usbck", parent_names, 3);
>>> +     parent_data[0] = AT91_CLK_PD_HW(sam9x7_plls[PLL_ID_PLLA][PLL_COMPID_DIV0].hw);
>>> +     parent_data[1] = AT91_CLK_PD_HW(sam9x7_plls[PLL_ID_UPLL][PLL_COMPID_DIV0].hw);
>>> +     parent_data[2] = AT91_CLK_PD_HW(main_osc_hw);
>>> +     usbck_hw = sam9x60_clk_register_usb(regmap, "usbck", NULL, parent_data, 3);
>>
>> sam9x60_clk_register_usb() could be converted to use parent_hws member of
>> struct clk_init_data instead of parent_data.
> 
> So this would mean that I would pass in an array of the plls as
> parent_hws, and use that to load the clk_init_data struct instead of
> filling the array of parent_data as it is changed to in this patch set?
> 
> And this would be functionally the same since parent_data points to
> clk_hw?>
> 

It should be something like:

  	usb = kzalloc(sizeof(*usb), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -235,7 +235,10 @@ _at91sam9x5_clk_register_usb(struct regmap *regmap, const 
char *name, const clk_hw **parent_hws)

  	init.name = name;
  	init.ops = &at91sam9x5_usb_ops;
-	init.parent_names = parent_names;
+	if (parent_hws)
+		init.parent_hws = parent_hws;
+	else
+		init.parent_names = parent_names;

Thank you,
Claudiu