[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86y0mtb855.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 15:11:18 +0100
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rppt@...nel.org, graf@...zon.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, pratyush@...nel.org,
ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] kho: validate preserved memory map during population
On Tue, Dec 23 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> If the previous kernel enabled KHO but did not call kho_finalize()
> (e.g., CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE=n or userspace skipped the finalization step),
> the 'preserved-memory-map' property in the FDT remains empty/zero.
>
> Previously, kho_populate() would succeed regardless of the memory map's
> state, reserving the incoming scratch regions in memblock. However,
> kho_memory_init() would later fail to deserialize the empty map. By that
> time, the scratch regions were already registered, leading to partial
> initialization and subsequent list corruption (freeing scratch area
> twice) during kho_init().
>
> Move the validation of the preserved memory map earlier into
> kho_populate(). If the memory map is empty/NULL:
> 1. Abort kho_populate() immediately with -ENOENT.
> 2. Do not register or reserve the incoming scratch memory, allowing the new
> kernel to reclaim those pages as standard free memory.
> 3. Leave the global 'kho_in' state uninitialized.
>
> Consequently, kho_memory_init() sees no active KHO context
> (kho_in.mem_chunks_phys is 0) and falls back to kho_reserve_scratch(),
> allocating fresh scratch memory as if it were a standard cold boot.
>
> Fixes: de51999e687c ("kho: allow memory preservation state updates after finalization")
> Reported-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251218215613.GA17304@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
> Tested-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
[...]
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists