[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEtQ6WCbTa1wKduARwwp0k+EL4uyx1sSMUR2UAEE7cceFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 08:21:43 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, eperezma@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 00/19] virtio_ring in order support
On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 9:29 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 09:18:47AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 3:08 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all:
> > >
> > > This sereis tries to implement the VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to
> > > virtio_ring. This is done by introducing virtqueue ops so we can
> > > implement separate helpers for different virtqueue layout/features
> > > then the in-order were implemented on top.
> > >
> > > Tests shows 2%-19% imporvment with packed virtqueue PPS with KVM guest
> > > vhost-net/testpmd on the host.
> > >
> > > Changes since V8:
> > >
> > > - Rebase to vhost.git linux-next branch
> > > - Fix issue when indirect descriptor is disabled
> > > - use UINT_MAX instead of vq->num to indicate no batching is pending
> > > - Tweak the comments for used_entry
> > > - Various coding style tweaks and typo fixes
> > > - Try to use in_order varianet in in_order ops
> >
> > Michael, any chance to make this for this merge window?
> >
> > Thanks
>
> want to fix last minor comments?
Yes, I will post a new version.
Thanks
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists