[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cdmhdgwzrp2bmuqwjjn66gnvi3zu4p5fnbdkuzvrknu37asaq4@waf3az3hkk4o>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 11:31:45 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Gaurav Kohli <gaurav.kohli@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rui.zhang@...el.com, lukasz.luba@....com,
konradybcio@...nel.org, amitk@...nel.org, mani@...nel.org,
casey.connolly@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] dt-bindings: thermal: Add qcom,qmi-cooling yaml
bindings
On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 01:54:04PM +0530, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
>
> On 12/24/2025 1:00 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 06:02:22PM +0530, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
> > > The cooling subnode of a remoteproc represents a client of the Thermal
> > > Mitigation Device QMI service running on it. Each subnode of the cooling
> > > node represents a single control exposed by the service.
> > >
> > > Add maintainer name also and update this binding for cdsp substem.
> > >
> > > Co-developed-by: Casey Connolly <casey.connolly@...aro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kohli <gaurav.kohli@....qualcomm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Casey Connolly <casey.connolly@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/remoteproc/qcom,pas-common.yaml | 6 ++
> > > .../bindings/thermal/qcom,qmi-cooling.yaml | 99 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 105 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom,qmi-cooling.yaml
> > >
> > > +properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + enum:
> > > + - qcom,qmi-cooling-modem
> > > + - qcom,qmi-cooling-cdsp
> > > +
> > > + vdd:
> > > + $ref: "#/definitions/tmd"
> > > + description:
> > > + Modem processor temperature TMD
> > > + properties:
> > > + label:
> > > + const: modem
> > Why it being called vdd?
> >
> > Why do you define modem-specific node here, while the CDSP-specific is
> > defined under the if block?
>
> will remove modem in next post, earlier we were developing for all
> subsystem.
> right now wanted to post for cdsp subsystem first, will fix in next post.
Why? If there is no significant difference, merge support for all DSPs.
It would allow us to better understand the requirements for all DSP
kinds.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists