[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+HBbNGym6Q9b166n-P=h_JssOHm0yfyL73JZ+G9P81muK=g4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 11:30:14 +0100
From: Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
vkoul@...nel.org, andi.shyti@...nel.org, lee@...nel.org,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, linusw@...nel.org, Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com,
daniel.machon@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, olivia@...enic.com,
radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro, richard.genoud@...tlin.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, lars.povlsen@...rochip.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, luka.perkov@...tura.hr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/15] include: dt-bindings: add LAN969x clock bindings
On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 11:21 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 09:16:12PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> > Add the required LAN969x clock bindings.
>
> I do not see clock bindings actually here. Where is the actual binding?
> Commit msg does not help me at all to understand why you are doing this
> without actual required bindings.
I guess it is a bit confusing, there is no schema here, these are the
clock indexes that
reside in dt-bindings and are used by the SoC DTSI.
I guess I should have titled this something like:
dt-bindings: clock: lan969x: add binding includes for LAN969x clock IDs
Regards,
Robert
>
> Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
> example with 'git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE' on the directory
> your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are
> explained here:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.html#i-for-patch-submitters
> Bindings never have a "include" prefix.
>
> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The
> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
> See also:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17-rc3/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
--
Robert Marko
Staff Embedded Linux Engineer
Sartura d.d.
Lendavska ulica 16a
10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Email: robert.marko@...tura.hr
Web: www.sartura.hr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists