lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251224112600.1592218-1-lihaoxiang@isrc.iscas.ac.cn>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 19:26:00 +0800
From: Haoxiang Li <lihaoxiang@...c.iscas.ac.cn>
To: chleroy@...nel.org
Cc: dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
	ioana.ciornei@....com,
	lihaoxiang@...c.iscas.ac.cn,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	suhui@...china.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: fsl-mc: fix an error handling in fsl_mc_device_add()

On Wed, 24 Dec 2025 12:07:22 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Ah yes, I see.
> 
> But then all exit paths in fsl_mc_device_add() after device_initialize() 
> should call put_device() ?

> Then in fact the fix should instead be the following, shouldn't it ?

> diff --git a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c 
> b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c
> index 25845c04e562..6d132144ce25 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c
> @@ -905,11 +905,7 @@ int fsl_mc_device_add(struct fsl_mc_obj_desc *obj_desc,
>   	return 0;
> 
>   error_cleanup_dev:
> -	kfree(mc_dev->regions);
> -	if (mc_bus)
> -		kfree(mc_bus);
> -	else
> -		kfree(mc_dev);
> +	put_device(&mc_dev->dev);
> 
>   	return error;
>   }

Yes, I think so.
However, I submit a same fix months ago and got a reply:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/2025052622-nautical-suitably-486c@gregkh/

I didn't figure out why, and look forward to experts' guidance.

Thanks,
Haoxiang Li


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ