[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c44a14db-28b6-41f3-984b-bfe67fecfa66@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 17:48:03 +0530
From: ALOK TIWARI <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>
To: christian.loehle@....com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, sashal@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [report] Performance regressions introduced via "cpuidle: menu:
Remove iowait influence" on 6.12.y
Hi Christian,
On 12/3/2025 11:01 PM, ALOK TIWARI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m reporting a performance regression of up to 6% sequential I/O
> vdbench regression observed on 6.12.y kernel.
> While running performance benchmarks on v6.12.60 kernel the sequential
> I/O vdbench metrics are showing a 5-6% performance regression when
> compared to v6.12.48
>
> Bisect root cause commit
> ========================
> - commit b39b62075ab4 ("cpuidle: menu: Remove iowait influence")
>
> Things work fine again when the previously removed performance-
> multiplier code is added back.
>
> Test details
> ============
> The system is connected to a number of disks in disk array using
> multipathing and directio configuration in the vdbench profile.
>
> wd=wd1,sd=sd*,rdpct=0,seekpct=sequential,xfersize=128k
> rd=128k64T,wd=wd1,iorate=max,elapsed=600,interval=1,warmup=300,threads=64
>
>
> Thanks,
> Alok
>
Just a gentle ping in case this was missed.
Please let us know if we are missing anything or if there are additional
things to consider.
Thanks,
Alok
Powered by blists - more mailing lists