[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251224124254.17920-3-veyga@veygax.dev>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 12:44:22 +0000
From: veygax <veyga@...gax.dev>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>, Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org" <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Evan Lambert <veyga@...gax.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/msm: Replace unsafe snprintf usage with scnprintf
From: Evan Lambert <veyga@...gax.dev>
The refill_buf function uses snprintf to append to a fixed-size buffer.
snprintf returns the length that would have been written, which can
exceed the remaining buffer size. If this happens, ptr advances beyond
the buffer and rem becomes negative. In the 2nd iteration, rem is
treated as a large unsigned integer, causing snprintf to write oob.
While this behavior is technically mitigated by num_perfcntrs being
locked at 5, it's still unsafe if num_perfcntrs were ever to change/a
second source was added.
Signed-off-by: Evan Lambert <veyga@...gax.dev>
---
v2: Use real name in Signed-off-by as requested by Dmitry Baryshkov.
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_perf.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_perf.c
index d3c7889aaf26..c369d4acc378 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_perf.c
@@ -65,13 +65,13 @@ static int refill_buf(struct msm_perf_state *perf)
if ((perf->cnt++ % 32) == 0) {
/* Header line: */
- n = snprintf(ptr, rem, "%%BUSY");
+ n = scnprintf(ptr, rem, "%%BUSY");
ptr += n;
rem -= n;
for (i = 0; i < gpu->num_perfcntrs; i++) {
const struct msm_gpu_perfcntr *perfcntr = &gpu->perfcntrs[i];
- n = snprintf(ptr, rem, "\t%s", perfcntr->name);
+ n = scnprintf(ptr, rem, "\t%s", perfcntr->name);
ptr += n;
rem -= n;
}
@@ -93,21 +93,21 @@ static int refill_buf(struct msm_perf_state *perf)
return ret;
val = totaltime ? 1000 * activetime / totaltime : 0;
- n = snprintf(ptr, rem, "%3d.%d%%", val / 10, val % 10);
+ n = scnprintf(ptr, rem, "%3d.%d%%", val / 10, val % 10);
ptr += n;
rem -= n;
for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
/* cycle counters (I think).. convert to MHz.. */
val = cntrs[i] / 10000;
- n = snprintf(ptr, rem, "\t%5d.%02d",
+ n = scnprintf(ptr, rem, "\t%5d.%02d",
val / 100, val % 100);
ptr += n;
rem -= n;
}
}
- n = snprintf(ptr, rem, "\n");
+ n = scnprintf(ptr, rem, "\n");
ptr += n;
rem -= n;
--
2.52.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists