linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rt1320: fix 32-bit link failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <176658751288.454157.5259232304769892441.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 14:45:12 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>, 
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, 
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Shuming Fan <shumingf@...ltek.com>, 
 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, 
 Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>, 
 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rt1320: fix 32-bit link failure

On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 22:52:53 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A plain 64-bit division causes a link failure in some configurations:
> 
> ERROR: modpost: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [sound/soc/codecs/snd-soc-rt1320-sdw.ko] undefined!
> 
> Since this divides by a constant, using the div_u64() macro ends up
> turning this into an efficient multiply/shift operation where possible.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: rt1320: fix 32-bit link failure
      commit: 836ecc740ca829040d86a5371f1fcb276110df84

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark