[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAofZF5JMQP4wdcv4YNRWcBBhcSJUyi-gZmXSexL-XOQDjCX=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 16:18:20 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] umh: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 5:06 PM Marco Crivellari
<marco.crivellari@...e.com> wrote:
> [...]
> ---
> kernel/umh.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/umh.c b/kernel/umh.c
> index b4da45a3a7cf..cda899327952 100644
> --- a/kernel/umh.c
> +++ b/kernel/umh.c
> @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ int call_usermodehelper_exec(struct subprocess_info *sub_info, int wait)
> sub_info->complete = (wait == UMH_NO_WAIT) ? NULL : &done;
> sub_info->wait = wait;
>
> - queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &sub_info->work);
> + queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &sub_info->work);
> if (wait == UMH_NO_WAIT) /* task has freed sub_info */
> goto unlock;
Gentle ping.
Thanks!
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists