linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] MM_CID and HPCC mm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dd9fa8f0-b39f-4651-825d-a3d52c33d589@efficios.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 11:37:50 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] MM_CID and HPCC mm_struct static init fixes

On 2025-12-22 20:59, Andrew Morton wrote:
[...]
> Well, simply appending this series to your "mm: Fix OOM killer
> inaccuracy on large many-core systems, v10" will create an annoying
> bisection hole.
> 
> Also, there are some cc:stable fixes in here which depend upon the
> presence of "mm: Fix OOM killer inaccuracy on large many-core systems"
> series, which is all backwards.
> 
> 
> So for now I'll toss this series in there for testing but I'll ask for
> a redo, please.
> 
> - All cc:stable patches prepared in a standalone fashion against
>    latest mainline.
> 
> - Any non-cc:stable patches which fix things in current mm-new come
>    next.  Perhaps view these as preparation for "mm: Fix OOM killer
>    inaccuracy on large many-core systems".
> 
> - Then "mm: Fix OOM killer inaccuracy on large many-core systems,
>    v11" which incorporates anything which didn't make it into the above
>    two categories.
> 
> That could be as many as three patch series. Thanks.

Will do! It may take a few days due to holiday vacations here.

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com