[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c94aed3-bef9-4ae8-b9fa-bf2db113eee8@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 23:43:21 +0700
From: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Eugenio Pérez
<eperezma@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] virtio-net: make refill work a per receive queue
work
On 12/24/25 07:52, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 11:27 PM Bui Quang Minh
> <minhquangbui99@...il.com> wrote:
>> Currently, the refill work is a global delayed work for all the receive
>> queues. This commit makes the refill work a per receive queue so that we
>> can manage them separately and avoid further mistakes. It also helps the
>> successfully refilled queue avoid the napi_disable in the global delayed
>> refill work like before.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>
>> ---
> I may miss something but I think this patch is sufficient to fix the problem?
>
> Thanks
>
Yes, this fixes the reproducer in virtnet_rx_resume[_all] but the second
patch also fixes a bug variant in virtnet_open. After the first patch,
the enable_delayed_refill is still called before napi_enable. However,
the only possible delayed refill schedule is in virtnet_set_queues and
it can't happen between that window because during
virtnet_rx_resume[_all], we still holds the rtnl_lock. So leaving the
enable_delayed_refill before napi_enable does not cause an issue but it
feels not correct to me. But moving enable_delayed_refill after
napi_enable requires the new pending bool in the third patch.
Thanks,
Quang Minh.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists