lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d5469f9-9918-4707-a390-533f53eadbe4@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 00:03:05 +0700
From: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
 Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Eugenio Pérez
 <eperezma@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] virtio-net: make refill work a per receive queue
 work

On 12/24/25 17:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 10:25:31PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote:
>> Currently, the refill work is a global delayed work for all the receive
>> queues. This commit makes the refill work a per receive queue so that we
>> can manage them separately and avoid further mistakes. It also helps the
>> successfully refilled queue avoid the napi_disable in the global delayed
>> refill work like before.
>>
> this commit log is unreadable. before what? what is the problem with
> "refilled queue napi_disable" this refers to.

I mean that currently even if one RX queue is refilled successfully but 
another is not, then the successful one still gets napi_disable() in the 
global refill work. It will unnecessarily disrupt that queue I think.

>
>> Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>   1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index 1bb3aeca66c6..63126e490bda 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -379,6 +379,15 @@ struct receive_queue {
>>   	struct xdp_rxq_info xsk_rxq_info;
>>   
>>   	struct xdp_buff **xsk_buffs;
>> +
>> +	/* Is delayed refill enabled? */
>> +	bool refill_enabled;
>> +
>> +	/* The lock to synchronize the access to refill_enabled */
>> +	spinlock_t refill_lock;
>> +
>> +	/* Work struct for delayed refilling if we run low on memory. */
>> +	struct delayed_work refill;
>>   };
>>   
>>   #define VIRTIO_NET_RSS_MAX_KEY_SIZE     40
>> @@ -441,9 +450,6 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>>   	/* Packet virtio header size */
>>   	u8 hdr_len;
>>   
>> -	/* Work struct for delayed refilling if we run low on memory. */
>> -	struct delayed_work refill;
>> -
>>   	/* UDP tunnel support */
>>   	bool tx_tnl;
>>   
>> @@ -451,12 +457,6 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>>   
>>   	bool rx_tnl_csum;
>>   
>> -	/* Is delayed refill enabled? */
>> -	bool refill_enabled;
>> -
>> -	/* The lock to synchronize the access to refill_enabled */
>> -	spinlock_t refill_lock;
>> -
>>   	/* Work struct for config space updates */
>>   	struct work_struct config_work;
>>   
>> @@ -720,18 +720,18 @@ static void virtnet_rq_free_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>>   		put_page(virt_to_head_page(buf));
>>   }
>>   
>> -static void enable_delayed_refill(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>> +static void enable_delayed_refill(struct receive_queue *rq)
>>   {
>> -	spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> -	vi->refill_enabled = true;
>> -	spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> +	spin_lock_bh(&rq->refill_lock);
>> +	rq->refill_enabled = true;
>> +	spin_unlock_bh(&rq->refill_lock);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static void disable_delayed_refill(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>> +static void disable_delayed_refill(struct receive_queue *rq)
>>   {
>> -	spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> -	vi->refill_enabled = false;
>> -	spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> +	spin_lock_bh(&rq->refill_lock);
>> +	rq->refill_enabled = false;
>> +	spin_unlock_bh(&rq->refill_lock);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void enable_rx_mode_work(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>> @@ -2950,38 +2950,19 @@ static void virtnet_napi_disable(struct receive_queue *rq)
>>   
>>   static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>   {
>> -	struct virtnet_info *vi =
>> -		container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, refill.work);
>> +	struct receive_queue *rq =
>> +		container_of(work, struct receive_queue, refill.work);
>>   	bool still_empty;
>> -	int i;
>> -
>> -	for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> -		struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
>>   
>> -		/*
>> -		 * When queue API support is added in the future and the call
>> -		 * below becomes napi_disable_locked, this driver will need to
>> -		 * be refactored.
>> -		 *
>> -		 * One possible solution would be to:
>> -		 *   - cancel refill_work with cancel_delayed_work (note:
>> -		 *     non-sync)
>> -		 *   - cancel refill_work with cancel_delayed_work_sync in
>> -		 *     virtnet_remove after the netdev is unregistered
>> -		 *   - wrap all of the work in a lock (perhaps the netdev
>> -		 *     instance lock)
>> -		 *   - check netif_running() and return early to avoid a race
>> -		 */
>> -		napi_disable(&rq->napi);
>> -		still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
>> -		virtnet_napi_do_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi);
>> +	napi_disable(&rq->napi);
>> +	still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq->vq->vdev->priv, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	virtnet_napi_do_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi);
>>   
>> -		/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
>> -		 * we will *never* try to fill again.
>> -		 */
>> -		if (still_empty)
>> -			schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, HZ/2);
>> -	}
>> +	/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
>> +	 * we will *never* try to fill again.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (still_empty)
>> +		schedule_delayed_work(&rq->refill, HZ / 2);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int virtnet_receive_xsk_bufs(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>> @@ -3048,10 +3029,10 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget,
>>   
>>   	if (rq->vq->num_free > min((unsigned int)budget, virtqueue_get_vring_size(rq->vq)) / 2) {
>>   		if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
>> -			spin_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
>> -			if (vi->refill_enabled)
>> -				schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> -			spin_unlock(&vi->refill_lock);
>> +			spin_lock(&rq->refill_lock);
>> +			if (rq->refill_enabled)
>> +				schedule_delayed_work(&rq->refill, 0);
>> +			spin_unlock(&rq->refill_lock);
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   
>> @@ -3226,13 +3207,13 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>>   	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>>   	int i, err;
>>   
>> -	enable_delayed_refill(vi);
>> -
>>   	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> -		if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
>> +		if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs) {
>> +			enable_delayed_refill(&vi->rq[i]);
>>   			/* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
>>   			if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
>> -				schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> +				schedule_delayed_work(&vi->rq[i].refill, 0);
>> +		}
>>   
>>   		err = virtnet_enable_queue_pair(vi, i);
>>   		if (err < 0)
>> @@ -3251,10 +3232,9 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>>   	return 0;
>>   
>>   err_enable_qp:
>> -	disable_delayed_refill(vi);
>> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>> -
>>   	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
>> +		disable_delayed_refill(&vi->rq[i]);
>> +		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->rq[i].refill);
>>   		virtnet_disable_queue_pair(vi, i);
>>   		virtnet_cancel_dim(vi, &vi->rq[i].dim);
>>   	}
>> @@ -3447,14 +3427,15 @@ static void virtnet_rx_pause_all(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>>   {
>>   	int i;
>>   
>> -	/*
>> -	 * Make sure refill_work does not run concurrently to
>> -	 * avoid napi_disable race which leads to deadlock.
>> -	 */
>> -	disable_delayed_refill(vi);
>> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>> -	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
>> +	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Make sure refill_work does not run concurrently to
>> +		 * avoid napi_disable race which leads to deadlock.
>> +		 */
>> +		disable_delayed_refill(&vi->rq[i]);
>> +		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->rq[i].refill);
>>   		__virtnet_rx_pause(vi, &vi->rq[i]);
>> +	}
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void virtnet_rx_pause(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq)
>> @@ -3463,8 +3444,8 @@ static void virtnet_rx_pause(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq)
>>   	 * Make sure refill_work does not run concurrently to
>>   	 * avoid napi_disable race which leads to deadlock.
>>   	 */
>> -	disable_delayed_refill(vi);
>> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>> +	disable_delayed_refill(rq);
>> +	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&rq->refill);
>>   	__virtnet_rx_pause(vi, rq);
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -3481,25 +3462,26 @@ static void __virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>>   		virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
>>   
>>   	if (schedule_refill)
>> -		schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> +		schedule_delayed_work(&rq->refill, 0);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void virtnet_rx_resume_all(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>>   {
>>   	int i;
>>   
>> -	enable_delayed_refill(vi);
>>   	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> -		if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
>> +		if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs) {
>> +			enable_delayed_refill(&vi->rq[i]);
>>   			__virtnet_rx_resume(vi, &vi->rq[i], true);
>> -		else
>> +		} else {
>>   			__virtnet_rx_resume(vi, &vi->rq[i], false);
>> +		}
>>   	}
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq)
>>   {
>> -	enable_delayed_refill(vi);
>> +	enable_delayed_refill(rq);
>>   	__virtnet_rx_resume(vi, rq, true);
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -3830,10 +3812,16 @@ static int virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs)
>>   succ:
>>   	vi->curr_queue_pairs = queue_pairs;
>>   	/* virtnet_open() will refill when device is going to up. */
>> -	spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> -	if (dev->flags & IFF_UP && vi->refill_enabled)
>> -		schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> -	spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> +	if (dev->flags & IFF_UP) {
>> +		int i;
>> +
>> +		for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> +			spin_lock_bh(&vi->rq[i].refill_lock);
>> +			if (vi->rq[i].refill_enabled)
>> +				schedule_delayed_work(&vi->rq[i].refill, 0);
>> +			spin_unlock_bh(&vi->rq[i].refill_lock);
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>> @@ -3843,10 +3831,6 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev)
>>   	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>>   	int i;
>>   
>> -	/* Make sure NAPI doesn't schedule refill work */
>> -	disable_delayed_refill(vi);
>> -	/* Make sure refill_work doesn't re-enable napi! */
>> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>>   	/* Prevent the config change callback from changing carrier
>>   	 * after close
>>   	 */
>> @@ -3857,6 +3841,10 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev)
>>   	cancel_work_sync(&vi->config_work);
>>   
>>   	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> +		/* Make sure NAPI doesn't schedule refill work */
>> +		disable_delayed_refill(&vi->rq[i]);
>> +		/* Make sure refill_work doesn't re-enable napi! */
>> +		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->rq[i].refill);
>>   		virtnet_disable_queue_pair(vi, i);
>>   		virtnet_cancel_dim(vi, &vi->rq[i].dim);
>>   	}
>> @@ -5802,7 +5790,6 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>   
>>   	virtio_device_ready(vdev);
>>   
>> -	enable_delayed_refill(vi);
>>   	enable_rx_mode_work(vi);
>>   
>>   	if (netif_running(vi->dev)) {
>> @@ -6559,8 +6546,9 @@ static int virtnet_alloc_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>>   	if (!vi->rq)
>>   		goto err_rq;
>>   
>> -	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&vi->refill, refill_work);
>>   	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> +		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&vi->rq[i].refill, refill_work);
>> +		spin_lock_init(&vi->rq[i].refill_lock);
>>   		vi->rq[i].pages = NULL;
>>   		netif_napi_add_config(vi->dev, &vi->rq[i].napi, virtnet_poll,
>>   				      i);
>> @@ -6901,7 +6889,6 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>   
>>   	INIT_WORK(&vi->config_work, virtnet_config_changed_work);
>>   	INIT_WORK(&vi->rx_mode_work, virtnet_rx_mode_work);
>> -	spin_lock_init(&vi->refill_lock);
>>   
>>   	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) {
>>   		vi->mergeable_rx_bufs = true;
>> @@ -7165,7 +7152,9 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>   	net_failover_destroy(vi->failover);
>>   free_vqs:
>>   	virtio_reset_device(vdev);
>> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>> +	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
>> +		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->rq[i].refill);
>> +
>>   	free_receive_page_frags(vi);
>>   	virtnet_del_vqs(vi);
>>   free:
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ