[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <884758381.0ifERbkFSE@nukework.gtech>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 15:47:53 -0600
From: "Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>
To: jjohnson@...nel.org, ath11k@...ts.infradead.org,
Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanthakumar.thiagarajan@....qualcomm.com>,
Baochen Qiang <baochen.qiang@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: fix qmi memory allocation logic for CALDB region
On Monday, December 8, 2025 4:23:46 AM CST Baochen Qiang wrote:
> On 12/7/2025 1:58 AM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> > Memory region assignment in ath11k_qmi_assign_target_mem_chunk()
> >
> > assumes that:
> > 1. firmware will make a HOST_DDR_REGION_TYPE request, and
> > 2. this request is processed before CALDB_MEM_REGION_TYPE
> >
> > In this case CALDB_MEM_REGION_TYPE, can safely be assigned immediately
> > after the host region.
> >
> > However, if the HOST_DDR_REGION_TYPE request is not made, or the
> > reserved-memory node is not present, then res.start and res.end are 0,
> > and host_ddr_sz remains uninitialized. The physical address should
> > fall back to ATH11K_QMI_CALDB_ADDRESS. That doesn't happen:
> >
> > resource_size(&res) returns 1 for an empty resource, and thus the if
> > clause never takes the fallback path. ab->qmi.target_mem[idx].paddr
> > is assigned the uninitialized value of host_ddr_sz + 0 (res.start).
> >
> > Use "if (res.end > res.start)" for the predicate, which correctly
> > falls back to ATH11K_QMI_CALDB_ADDRESS.
I am ready to submit the IPQ9574 support. This patch is a dependency. Should I
include this change in the series that adds IPQ9574?
> In addition, does it make sense to do of_reserved_mem_region_to_resource()
> before the loop, which may give CALDB_MEM_REGION_TYPE a chance even
> HOST_DDR_REGION_TYPE request is not made?
I'm sorry that I initially missed this question. I don't think we should move
&res initialization outside the loop. We also need host_ddr_sz to be
initialized by a HOST_DDR_REGION_TYPE (1) request. On IPQ9574, the firmware
doesn't make that request, so host_ddr_sz remains uninitialized. Since &res
and host_ddr_sz are used together, I think it's better to initialize them,
together.
Without patch:
ath11k c000000.wifi: qmi firmware request memory request
ath11k c000000.wifi: qmi mem seg type 4 size 409600
ath11k c000000.wifi: qmi mem seg type 2 size 262144
ath11k c000000.wifi: qmi mem seg type 3 size 1048576
...
ath11k c000000.wifi: failed to assign qmi target memory: -5
With patch:
ath11k c000000.wifi: qmi firmware request memory request
ath11k c000000.wifi: qmi mem seg type 4 size 409600
ath11k c000000.wifi: qmi mem seg type 2 size 262144
ath11k c000000.wifi: qmi mem seg type 3 size 1048576
ath11k c000000.wifi: qmi ignore invalid mem req type 3
ath11k c000000.wifi: qmi req mem_seg[0] 0x000000004ba00000 409600 4
ath11k c000000.wifi: qmi req mem_seg[1] 0x000000004b700000 262144 2
Tested on : WLAN.HK.2.9.0.1-01890-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists