linux-kernel - Re: [cgroup/for-6.20 PATCH 3/4] cgroup/cpuset: Don't fail cpuset.cpus change in v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dc9cd447-6431-46f6-b93d-fd2e317aa630@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 17:30:53 +0800
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...weicloud.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
 Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Koutný
 <mkoutny@...e.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Sun Shaojie <sunshaojie@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [cgroup/for-6.20 PATCH 3/4] cgroup/cpuset: Don't fail cpuset.cpus
 change in v2



On 2025/12/25 15:30, Waiman Long wrote:
> Commit fe8cd2736e75 ("cgroup/cpuset: Delay setting of CS_CPU_EXCLUSIVE
> until valid partition") introduced a new check to disallow the setting
> of a new cpuset.cpus.exclusive value that is a superset of a sibling's
> cpuset.cpus value so that there will at least be one CPU left in the
> sibling in case the cpuset becomes a valid partition root. This new
> check does have the side effect of failing a cpuset.cpus change that
> make it a subset of a sibling's cpuset.cpus.exclusive value.
> 
> With v2, users are supposed to be allowed to set whatever value they
> want in cpuset.cpus without failure. To maintain this rule, the check
> is now restricted to only when cpuset.cpus.exclusive is being changed
> not when cpuset.cpus is changed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 850334dbc36a..83bf6b588e5f 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -609,33 +609,31 @@ static inline bool cpusets_are_exclusive(struct cpuset *cs1, struct cpuset *cs2)
>  
>  /**
>   * cpus_excl_conflict - Check if two cpusets have exclusive CPU conflicts
> - * @cs1: first cpuset to check
> - * @cs2: second cpuset to check
> + * @trial:	the trial cpuset to be checked
> + * @sibling:	a sibling cpuset to be checked against
> + * @new_xcpus:	new exclusive_cpus in trial cpuset
>   *

Can we rename it to xcpus_changed?

The current name new_xcpus gives me the impression that CPUs are being added.
For example: if exclusive_cpus is 1, and it changes to 1-7, then new_xcpus would be 2-7.

>   * Returns: true if CPU exclusivity conflict exists, false otherwise
>   *
>   * Conflict detection rules:
>   * 1. If either cpuset is CPU exclusive, they must be mutually exclusive
>   * 2. exclusive_cpus masks cannot intersect between cpusets
> - * 3. The allowed CPUs of one cpuset cannot be a subset of another's exclusive CPUs
> + * 3. The allowed CPUs of a sibling cpuset cannot be a subset of the new exclusive CPUs
>   */
> -static inline bool cpus_excl_conflict(struct cpuset *cs1, struct cpuset *cs2)
> +static inline bool cpus_excl_conflict(struct cpuset *trial, struct cpuset *sibling,
> +				      bool new_xcpus)
>  {
>  	/* If either cpuset is exclusive, check if they are mutually exclusive */
> -	if (is_cpu_exclusive(cs1) || is_cpu_exclusive(cs2))
> -		return !cpusets_are_exclusive(cs1, cs2);
> +	if (is_cpu_exclusive(trial) || is_cpu_exclusive(sibling))
> +		return !cpusets_are_exclusive(trial, sibling);
>  
>  	/* Exclusive_cpus cannot intersect */
> -	if (cpumask_intersects(cs1->exclusive_cpus, cs2->exclusive_cpus))
> +	if (cpumask_intersects(trial->exclusive_cpus, sibling->exclusive_cpus))
>  		return true;
>  
> -	/* The cpus_allowed of one cpuset cannot be a subset of another cpuset's exclusive_cpus */
> -	if (!cpumask_empty(cs1->cpus_allowed) &&
> -	    cpumask_subset(cs1->cpus_allowed, cs2->exclusive_cpus))
> -		return true;
> -
> -	if (!cpumask_empty(cs2->cpus_allowed) &&
> -	    cpumask_subset(cs2->cpus_allowed, cs1->exclusive_cpus))
> +	/* The cpus_allowed of a sibling cpuset cannot be a subset of the new exclusive_cpus */
> +	if (new_xcpus && !cpumask_empty(sibling->cpus_allowed) &&
> +	    cpumask_subset(sibling->cpus_allowed, trial->exclusive_cpus))
>  		return true;
>  
>  	return false;
> @@ -672,6 +670,7 @@ static int validate_change(struct cpuset *cur, struct cpuset *trial)
>  {
>  	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
>  	struct cpuset *c, *par;
> +	bool new_xcpus;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> @@ -728,10 +727,11 @@ static int validate_change(struct cpuset *cur, struct cpuset *trial)
>  	 * overlap. exclusive_cpus cannot overlap with each other if set.
>  	 */
>  	ret = -EINVAL;
> +	new_xcpus = !cpumask_equal(cur->exclusive_cpus, trial->exclusive_cpus);
>  	cpuset_for_each_child(c, css, par) {
>  		if (c == cur)
>  			continue;
> -		if (cpus_excl_conflict(trial, c))
> +		if (cpus_excl_conflict(trial, c, new_xcpus))
>  			goto out;
>  		if (mems_excl_conflict(trial, c))
>  			goto out;

-- 
Best regards,
Ridong