linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: ath11k: move .max_tx_ring to struct ath11k_hw_hal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <566f4d26-8a36-415b-9ec7-3dc5082acb2b@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 17:53:46 +0800
From: Baochen Qiang <baochen.qiang@....qualcomm.com>
To: "Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>, ath11k@...ts.infradead.org,
        Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: ath11k: move .max_tx_ring to struct
 ath11k_hw_hal_params



On 12/25/2025 5:53 AM, Alex G. wrote:

> 
> Sure, I will do it this way.
> 
> I am ready to submit the IPQ9574 support, and this patch is a dependency. 
> Should I include v3 of this patch in the IPQ9574 series, or submit v3 
> independently?
> 
> Alex
> 

I would suggest a v3 for track purpose. Another reason is that this patch is more of an
optimization benefiting all chips, rather than being specific to your new chip.