linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 3/7] kernel.h: move VERIFY_OCTAL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251225170930.1151781-4-yury.norov@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 12:09:25 -0500
From: "Yury Norov (NVIDIA)" <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <chleroy@...nel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Laight <david.laight@...box.com>,
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Yury Norov (NVIDIA)" <yury.norov@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/7] kernel.h: move VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS() to sysfs.h

The macro is related to sysfs, but is defined in kernel.h. Move it to
the proper header, and unload the generic kernel.h.

Now that the macro is removed from kernel.h, linux/moduleparam.h is
decoupled, and kernel.h inclusion can be removed.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov (NVIDIA) <yury.norov@...il.com>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst |  2 +-
 include/linux/kernel.h              | 12 ------------
 include/linux/moduleparam.h         |  2 +-
 include/linux/sysfs.h               | 13 +++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst
index 2703c04af7d0..ffcef4d6bc8d 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ is equivalent to doing::
 	    .store = store_foo,
     };
 
-Note as stated in include/linux/kernel.h "OTHER_WRITABLE?  Generally
+Note as stated in include/linux/sysfs.h "OTHER_WRITABLE?  Generally
 considered a bad idea." so trying to set a sysfs file writable for
 everyone will fail reverting to RO mode for "Others".
 
diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index 61d63c57bc2d..5b879bfea948 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -389,16 +389,4 @@ static inline void ftrace_dump(enum ftrace_dump_mode oops_dump_mode) { }
 # define REBUILD_DUE_TO_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
 #endif
 
-/* Permissions on a sysfs file: you didn't miss the 0 prefix did you? */
-#define VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(perms)						\
-	(BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perms) < 0) +					\
-	 BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perms) > 0777) +					\
-	 /* USER_READABLE >= GROUP_READABLE >= OTHER_READABLE */		\
-	 BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perms) >> 6) & 4) < (((perms) >> 3) & 4)) +	\
-	 BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perms) >> 3) & 4) < ((perms) & 4)) +		\
-	 /* USER_WRITABLE >= GROUP_WRITABLE */					\
-	 BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perms) >> 6) & 2) < (((perms) >> 3) & 2)) +	\
-	 /* OTHER_WRITABLE?  Generally considered a bad idea. */		\
-	 BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perms) & 2) +					\
-	 (perms))
 #endif
diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
index 03a977168c52..281a006dc284 100644
--- a/include/linux/moduleparam.h
+++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/stringify.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sysfs.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 
 /*
diff --git a/include/linux/sysfs.h b/include/linux/sysfs.h
index c33a96b7391a..99b775f3ff46 100644
--- a/include/linux/sysfs.h
+++ b/include/linux/sysfs.h
@@ -808,4 +808,17 @@ static inline void sysfs_put(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 	kernfs_put(kn);
 }
 
+/* Permissions on a sysfs file: you didn't miss the 0 prefix did you? */
+#define VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(perms)						\
+	(BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perms) < 0) +					\
+	 BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perms) > 0777) +					\
+	 /* USER_READABLE >= GROUP_READABLE >= OTHER_READABLE */		\
+	 BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perms) >> 6) & 4) < (((perms) >> 3) & 4)) +	\
+	 BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perms) >> 3) & 4) < ((perms) & 4)) +		\
+	 /* USER_WRITABLE >= GROUP_WRITABLE */					\
+	 BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perms) >> 6) & 2) < (((perms) >> 3) & 2)) +	\
+	 /* OTHER_WRITABLE?  Generally considered a bad idea. */		\
+	 BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perms) & 2) +					\
+	 (perms))
+
 #endif /* _SYSFS_H_ */
-- 
2.43.0