[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b8cae37a-65c9-4380-9290-8494c854373e@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 10:57:55 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@...ux.dev>
Cc: frederic@...nel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org, joelagnelf@...dia.com,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu-tasks: Remove unnecessary smp_store operations in
the cblist_init_generic()
On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 10:49:04AM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> The cblist_init_generic() is executed during the CPU early boot
> phase due to commit:30ef09635b9e ("rcu-tasks: Initialize callback
> lists at rcu_init() time"), at this time, only one boot CPU is
> online. this commit therefore use WRITE_ONCE() to replace the
> smp_store_release() to assigning rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim in the
> cblist_init_generic().
>
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@...ux.dev>
Good eyes, thank you!
But in that case, we are running on a single CPU with interrupts disables,
so do we even need WRITE_ONCE()?
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> index 76f952196a29..f763f60d5e50 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static void cblist_init_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
> shift++;
> WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, shift);
> WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, lim);
> - smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, lim);
> + WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, lim);
>
> pr_info("%s: Setting shift to %d and lim to %d rcu_task_cb_adjust=%d rcu_task_cpu_ids=%d.\n",
> rtp->name, data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift), data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim),
> --
> 2.48.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists