[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f54caaa-1936-4a37-8046-0335e469935d@bsbernd.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 22:34:46 +0100
From: Bernd Schubert <bernd@...ernd.com>
To: Kuang Kai <kuangkai@...inos.cn>, miklos@...redi.hu
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kk47yx@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: show the io_uring mount option
On 12/25/25 06:50, Kuang Kai wrote:
> From: kuangkai <kuangkai@...inos.cn>
>
> mount with io_uring options will not work if the kernel parameter of /sys/module/fuse/parameters/enable_uring has not been set,
> displaying this option can help confirm whether the fuse over io_uring function is enabled.
The problem is that is io_uring is not a mount option, showing it as
such would not be right. Maybe showing all FUSE_INIT parameters should
be added in /sys?
Thanks,
Bernd
>
> Signed-off-by: kuangkai <kuangkai@...inos.cn>
> ---
> fs/fuse/inode.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> index 21e04c394a80..190de3f29552 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> @@ -937,6 +937,11 @@ static int fuse_show_options(struct seq_file *m, struct dentry *root)
> seq_puts(m, ",dax=inode");
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUSE_IO_URING
> + if (fc->io_uring)
> + seq_puts(m, ",io_uring");
> +#endif
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists