[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a844934b105136f576ab46a5779cf57ef0cc7bbb.camel@svanheule.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2025 15:52:25 +0100
From: Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, kernel test robot
<lkp@...el.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek
<pavel@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Michael
Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit
<hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Randy Dunlap
<rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Paul Gazzillo <paul@...zz.com>, Necip Fazil Yildiran
<fazilyildiran@...il.com>, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] mfd: Add RTL8231 core device
Hi Krzysztof,
On Fri, 2025-12-26 at 13:19 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/12/2025 12:59, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> > > kismet warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> > > > > kismet: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for MDIO_BUS when
> > > > > selected by REGMAP_MDIO
> > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for MDIO_BUS
> > > Depends on [n]: NETDEVICES [=n]
> > > Selected by [y]:
> > > - REGMAP_MDIO [=y]
> >
> > I'm a bit puzzled on how to solve this one. The issue detected here is that
> > my
> > driver (MFD_RTL8231) selects REGMAP_MDIO, which in turn selects MDIO_BUS.
> > The
> > latter is dependent on NETDEVICES, which is not selected in this test.
> > The kernel does not yet have any other consumers of REGMAP_MDIO, which is
> > probably the reason the dependency issue has gone undetected until now.
> >
> > REGMAP_MDIO is not a visible symbol, so it must be selected by drivers.
>
> Reminds me old problem, probably the same:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250515140555.325601-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250516141722.13772-1-afd@ti.com/
>
> Exactly the same MDIO here and there.
> > [...]
> Rather fix the same way Andrew did it. Or maybe his patch was not merged?
Andrew's patch was merged, that's the code I'm seeing now. I think by
placing the dependency under REGMAP_MDIO (or REGMAP_IRQ) instead of
REGMAP, it just made the circular dependency less visible.
Making PINCTRL_RTL8231 "depends on GPIOLIB", like the GPIO drivers, only
shortens the circular dependency loop:
error: recursive dependency detected!
symbol IRQ_DOMAIN is selected by MFD_CORE
symbol MFD_CORE is selected by MFD_RTL8231
symbol MFD_RTL8231 depends on MDIO_BUS
symbol MDIO_BUS is selected by PHYLIB
symbol PHYLIB is selected by ARC_EMAC_CORE
symbol ARC_EMAC_CORE is selected by EMAC_ROCKCHIP
symbol EMAC_ROCKCHIP depends on OF_IRQ
symbol OF_IRQ depends on IRQ_DOMAIN
Of these symbols, IRQ_DOMAIN and OF_IRQ are hidden symbols, so they must be
selected by another symbol to be used. As shown above, OF_IRQ *depends* on
IRQ_DOMAIN, which means some other symbol *must* select it for the dependency to
be satisfied, as IRQ_DOMAIN also cannot be selected directly by the user. OF_IRQ
also appears to be the only symbol in the kernel to depend on, rather than
select, IRQ_DOMAIN.
Turning the dependency of OF_IRQ on IRQ_DOMAIN around resolves the dependency
loop here, and ensures the hidden IRQ_DOMAIN symbol is selected whenever any
other symbol selects OF_IRQ.
The same reasoning was actually used in 2023 to suggest this change as well:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230213041535.12083-3-rdunlap@infradead.org/
I found some follow-up, but it didn't look like it actually got wrapped up:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230313023935.31037-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/
Randy, do you happen to recall if/why this stalled? Should we just try to invert
the dependency again if there is no pressing need for the "proper" clean-up?
Best,
Sander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists