[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aaf20c5c-0cbe-c1ba-c749-971ddd5b0351@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2025 23:12:52 +0530
From: Shivendra Pratap <shivendra.pratap@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Souvik Chakravarty <Souvik.Chakravarty@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Yan
<andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@....qualcomm.com>,
Andre Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>,
Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@....qualcomm.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 05/10] dt-bindings: arm: Document reboot mode magic
On 12/26/2025 4:37 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/12/2025 18:07, Shivendra Pratap wrote:
>> Add bindings to describe vendor-specific reboot modes. Values here
>> correspond to valid parameters to vendor-specific reset types in PSCI
>> SYSTEM_RESET2 call.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Shivendra Pratap <shivendra.pratap@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
>>
>
>
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
> kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
> your patches on recent Linux kernel.
>
> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
> (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
> fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
> patches to the patchset.
>
> You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
> tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
> a waste of time.
>
> Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
sure. thanks. Will make sure on this.
thanks,
Shivendra
Powered by blists - more mailing lists