[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251227105701.5cbeb47e@robin>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2025 10:57:01 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Yury Norov (NVIDIA)" <yury.norov@...il.com>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Christophe Leroy
<chleroy@...nel.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...nel.org>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Joonas
Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, David Laight
<david.laight@...box.com>, Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>, Andi Shyti
<andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Tvrtko
Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>, Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...nel.org>, Greg
Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] kernel.h: drop trace_printk.h
On Sat, 27 Dec 2025 16:45:47 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > I'm fine for trying other ways to speed up the compilation, but removing
> > full access to trace_printk() isn't one of them.
>
> I interpreted this as if the header inclusion should be moved from kernel.h
> to printk.h as a compromise that satisfies all (?) stakeholders. Is it possible
> approach?
I'm fine with putting the include of trace_printk.h into printk.h. If
you remove printk.h from kernel.h I would expect a lot more people to
complain about it. Including Linus himself.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists