[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <176681070372.16766.3882354586761538831@noble.neil.brown.name>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2025 15:45:03 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...mail.net>
To: "Bagas Sanjaya" <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux Filesystems Development" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@...nel.org>, "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>,
"Mateusz Guzik" <mjguzik@...il.com>, "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@...il.com>, "Bagas Sanjaya" <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] VFS: fix __start_dirop() kernel-doc warnings
On Fri, 19 Dec 2025, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Sphinx report kernel-doc warnings:
>
> WARNING: ./fs/namei.c:2853 function parameter 'state' not described in '__start_dirop'
> WARNING: ./fs/namei.c:2853 expecting prototype for start_dirop(). Prototype was for __start_dirop() instead
>
> Fix them up.
>
> Fixes: ff7c4ea11a05c8 ("VFS: add start_creating_killable() and start_removing_killable()")
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/namei.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index bf0f66f0e9b92c..91fd3a786704e2 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -2836,10 +2836,11 @@ static int filename_parentat(int dfd, struct filename *name,
> }
>
> /**
> - * start_dirop - begin a create or remove dirop, performing locking and lookup
> + * __start_dirop - begin a create or remove dirop, performing locking and lookup
> * @parent: the dentry of the parent in which the operation will occur
> * @name: a qstr holding the name within that parent
> * @lookup_flags: intent and other lookup flags.
> + * @state: task state bitmask
I would really rather the doco comment was moved to be before
start_dirop(), and left unchanged.
Otherwise we would really need to actually docoument "@state", not just
add vague words to shut the checker up.
There was already been a patch posted to do this.
NeilBrown
> *
> * The lookup is performed and necessary locks are taken so that, on success,
> * the returned dentry can be operated on safely.
> --
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists