[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DFA1WXRTC62E.3825Z5WT388SJ@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2025 19:12:08 +0100
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>
To: "Matthew Maurer" <mmaurer@...gle.com>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>, "Andreas
Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman"
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, "Lee
Jones" <lee@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] docs: ABI: sysfs-devices-soc: Fix swapped sample
values
On Fri Dec 26, 2025 at 9:17 PM CET, Matthew Maurer wrote:
> The sample values for `family` and `machine` were swapped relative to
> what the driver actually does, and doesn't match the field description.
>
> Reviewed-by: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com>
Fixes: da5a70f3519f ("Documentation: add information for new sysfs soc bus functionality")
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-soc | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-soc b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-soc
> index 5269808ec35f8e2b18516556f886c77f5fac9401..cb6776a4afe02a76fe27ac6fc236babdc7865287 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-soc
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-soc
> @@ -17,14 +17,14 @@ Date: January 2012
> contact: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
> Description:
> Read-only attribute common to all SoCs. Contains the SoC machine
> - name (e.g. Ux500).
> + name (e.g. DB8500).
>
> What: /sys/devices/socX/family
> Date: January 2012
> contact: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
> Description:
> Read-only attribute common to all SoCs. Contains SoC family name
> - (e.g. DB8500).
> + (e.g. ux500).
Is the change from "Ux500" to "ux500" intended?
(If not, no need to resend, I can fix it up on apply.)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists