[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251228-kunit-kbuild_output-v1-1-f1fb30fe060f@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2025 16:55:19 +0900
From: Ryota Sakamoto <sakamo.ryota@...il.com>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Rae Moar <raemoar63@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ryota Sakamoto <sakamo.ryota@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC] kunit: respect KBUILD_OUTPUT env variable by default
Currently, kunit.py ignores the KBUILD_OUTPUT env variable and always
defaults to .kunit in the working directory. This behavior is inconsistent
with standard Kbuild behavior, where KBUILD_OUTPUT defines the build
artifact location.
This patch modifies kunit.py to respect KBUILD_OUTPUT if set. A .kunit
subdirectory is created inside KBUILD_OUTPUT to avoid polluting the build
directory.
Signed-off-by: Ryota Sakamoto <sakamo.ryota@...il.com>
---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 7 ++++++-
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
index cd99c1956331dbbfb06cf4ddf130db3dcf2a7c31..e3d82a038f93df0e86952da92461bc2e02f69ed1 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
@@ -323,11 +323,16 @@ def get_default_jobs() -> int:
return ncpu
raise RuntimeError("os.cpu_count() returned None")
+def get_default_build_dir() -> str:
+ if 'KBUILD_OUTPUT' in os.environ:
+ return os.path.join(os.environ['KBUILD_OUTPUT'], '.kunit')
+ return '.kunit'
+
def add_common_opts(parser: argparse.ArgumentParser) -> None:
parser.add_argument('--build_dir',
help='As in the make command, it specifies the build '
'directory.',
- type=str, default='.kunit', metavar='DIR')
+ type=str, default=get_default_build_dir(), metavar='DIR')
parser.add_argument('--make_options',
help='X=Y make option, can be repeated.',
action='append', metavar='X=Y')
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index bbba921e0eacb18663abfcabb2bccf330d8666f5..a55b5085310d1bc54a549d3f36a83f7697fb8881 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -601,6 +601,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
all_passed_log = file.readlines()
self.print_mock = mock.patch('kunit_printer.Printer.print').start()
+ mock.patch.dict(os.environ, clear=True).start()
self.addCleanup(mock.patch.stopall)
self.mock_linux_init = mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree').start()
@@ -723,6 +724,24 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
args=None, build_dir=build_dir, filter_glob='', filter='', filter_action=None, timeout=300)
self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
+ @mock.patch.dict(os.environ, {'KBUILD_OUTPUT': '/tmp'})
+ def test_run_builddir_from_env(self):
+ build_dir = '/tmp/.kunit'
+ kunit.main(['run'])
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1)
+ self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with(
+ args=None, build_dir=build_dir, filter_glob='', filter='', filter_action=None, timeout=300)
+ self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
+
+ @mock.patch.dict(os.environ, {'KBUILD_OUTPUT': '/tmp'})
+ def test_run_builddir_override(self):
+ build_dir = '.kunit'
+ kunit.main(['run', '--build_dir=.kunit'])
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1)
+ self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with(
+ args=None, build_dir=build_dir, filter_glob='', filter='', filter_action=None, timeout=300)
+ self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
+
def test_config_builddir(self):
build_dir = '.kunit'
kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir', build_dir])
---
base-commit: ccd1cdca5cd433c8a5dff78b69a79b31d9b77ee1
change-id: 20251228-kunit-kbuild_output-5d21a89fa603
Best regards,
--
Ryota Sakamoto <sakamo.ryota@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists