linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/9] sysctl: Generate do_proc_doulongvec_minmax with do_proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202512291555.395cc7b0-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 15:17:58 +0800
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
To: Joel Granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>
CC: <oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Alexander Viro
	<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara
	<jack@...e.cz>, Joel Granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>,
	<oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] sysctl: Generate do_proc_doulongvec_minmax with
 do_proc_dotypevec macro



Hello,

kernel test robot noticed "blktests.block/020.fail" on:

commit: 216729bf72d98eca7a48326bb17b577c3fde9634 ("[PATCH 3/9] sysctl: Generate do_proc_doulongvec_minmax with do_proc_dotypevec macro")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Joel-Granados/sysctl-Move-default-converter-assignment-out-of-do_proc_dointvec/20251219-202253
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251219-jag-dovec_consolidate-v1-3-1413b92c6040@kernel.org/
patch subject: [PATCH 3/9] sysctl: Generate do_proc_doulongvec_minmax with do_proc_dotypevec macro

in testcase: blktests
version: blktests-x86_64-b1b99d1-1_20251223
with following parameters:

	disk: 1HDD
	test: block-020



config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-func
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6500 CPU @ 3.20GHz (Skylake) with 32G memory

(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)



If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202512291555.395cc7b0-lkp@intel.com

2025-12-26 15:49:33 cd /lkp/benchmarks/blktests
2025-12-26 15:49:33 echo block/020
2025-12-26 15:49:33 ./check block/020
block/020 (run null-blk on different schedulers with only one hardware tag)
block/020 (run null-blk on different schedulers with only one hardware tag) [failed]
    runtime    ...  42.071s
    --- tests/block/020.out	2025-12-23 16:47:43.000000000 +0000
    +++ /lkp/benchmarks/blktests/results/nodev/block/020.out.bad	2025-12-26 15:50:16.434082831 +0000
    @@ -1,2 +1,10 @@
     Running block/020
    +iodepth: min value out of range: -16384 (1 min)
    +_fio_perf: too many terse lines
    +iodepth: min value out of range: -16384 (1 min)
    +_fio_perf: too many terse lines
    +iodepth: min value out of range: -16384 (1 min)
    +_fio_perf: too many terse lines
    ...
    (Run 'diff -u tests/block/020.out /lkp/benchmarks/blktests/results/nodev/block/020.out.bad' to see the entire diff)



The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251229/202512291555.395cc7b0-lkp@intel.com



-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki