[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aVJiYSbpmHMGJarA@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 12:13:37 +0100
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
To: Barnabás Czémán <barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Add MSM8937
On Sun, Dec 28, 2025 at 03:21:56PM +0100, Barnabás Czémán wrote:
> Add support for MSM8937 MSS it similar to MSM8917 MSS.
> It differs primarily in that TZ needs to be informed of
> the modem start address and pas_id.
>
> Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán <barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> index 2579558fb567..2ffcea7dbc79 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> @@ -261,6 +261,7 @@ enum {
> MSS_MSM8916,
> MSS_MSM8917,
> MSS_MSM8926,
> + MSS_MSM8937,
> MSS_MSM8953,
> MSS_MSM8974,
> MSS_MSM8996,
> @@ -751,6 +752,7 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> } else if (qproc->version == MSS_MDM9607 ||
> qproc->version == MSS_MSM8909 ||
> qproc->version == MSS_MSM8917 ||
> + qproc->version == MSS_MSM8937 ||
> qproc->version == MSS_MSM8953 ||
> qproc->version == MSS_MSM8996 ||
> qproc->version == MSS_MSM8998 ||
> @@ -758,7 +760,8 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
>
> /* Override the ACC value if required */
> if (qproc->version == MSS_MDM9607 ||
> - qproc->version == MSS_MSM8917)
> + qproc->version == MSS_MSM8917 ||
> + qproc->version == MSS_MSM8937)
> writel(QDSP6SS_ACC_OVERRIDE_VAL_9607,
> qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_STRAP_ACC);
> else if (qproc->version != MSS_MSM8909 &&
> @@ -821,6 +824,7 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> /* Turn on L1, L2, ETB and JU memories 1 at a time */
> if (qproc->version == MSS_MDM9607 ||
> qproc->version == MSS_MSM8917 ||
> + qproc->version == MSS_MSM8937 ||
> qproc->version == MSS_MSM8953 ||
> qproc->version == MSS_MSM8996) {
> mem_pwr_ctl = QDSP6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL;
> @@ -831,7 +835,8 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> * "inrush current" issues.
> */
> if (qproc->version == MSS_MDM9607 ||
> - qproc->version == MSS_MSM8917)
> + qproc->version == MSS_MSM8917 ||
> + qproc->version == MSS_MSM8937)
> reverse = 6;
> } else {
> /* MSS_MSM8998, MSS_SDM660 */
> @@ -1466,7 +1471,8 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> max_addr = ALIGN(phdr->p_paddr + phdr->p_memsz, SZ_4K);
> }
>
> - if (qproc->version == MSS_MSM8953) {
> + if (qproc->version == MSS_MSM8937 ||
> + qproc->version == MSS_MSM8953) {
> ret = qcom_scm_pas_mem_setup(MPSS_PAS_ID, qproc->mpss_phys, qproc->mpss_size);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(qproc->dev,
I think for consistency it would be cleaner if this was a flag like
"need_mem_protection" (i.e. something like "need_pas_mem_setup"). Then
you could reuse the actual reset sequence from MSS_MDM9607 similar to
MSM8917.
Thanks,
Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists