lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26bed077-8450-40ec-97f3-50b7771e4c9b@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 13:20:51 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Pradeep P V K <pradeep.pragallapati@....qualcomm.com>, vkoul@...nel.org,
 neil.armstrong@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com, andersson@...nel.org,
 konradybcio@...nel.org, taniya.das@....qualcomm.com,
 dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, nitin.rawat@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 2/4] scsi: ufs: qcom: dt-bindings: Add UFSHC compatible
 for Hamoa

On 29/12/2025 08:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/12/2025 07:06, Pradeep P V K wrote:
>> Document the UFSHC compatible for Qualcomm Hamoa SoC. Use fallback
>> to indicate the compatibility of UFSHC on Hamoa with that on the
>> SM8550.
> 
> Same problem.
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <pradeep.pragallapati@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml          | 6 +++++-
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml
>> index d94ef4e6b85a..3b5a95db7831 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml
> 
> That's older devices binding. Why would Hamoa fit here?


... and why even bothering with testing this? Every internal guide tells
you this yet you sent it untested.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ