[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26bed077-8450-40ec-97f3-50b7771e4c9b@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 13:20:51 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Pradeep P V K <pradeep.pragallapati@....qualcomm.com>, vkoul@...nel.org,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com, andersson@...nel.org,
konradybcio@...nel.org, taniya.das@....qualcomm.com,
dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, nitin.rawat@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 2/4] scsi: ufs: qcom: dt-bindings: Add UFSHC compatible
for Hamoa
On 29/12/2025 08:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/12/2025 07:06, Pradeep P V K wrote:
>> Document the UFSHC compatible for Qualcomm Hamoa SoC. Use fallback
>> to indicate the compatibility of UFSHC on Hamoa with that on the
>> SM8550.
>
> Same problem.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <pradeep.pragallapati@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml
>> index d94ef4e6b85a..3b5a95db7831 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml
>
> That's older devices binding. Why would Hamoa fit here?
... and why even bothering with testing this? Every internal guide tells
you this yet you sent it untested.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists