linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-armoury: add support for GU605CR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <79bb267b-d24b-40a8-ae82-fa4d813cb234@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 15:56:45 +0100
From: Denis Benato <benato.denis96@...il.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 Denis Benato <denis.benato@...ux.dev>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
 Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>, "Luke D . Jones" <luke@...nes.dev>,
 Mateusz Schyboll <dragonn@...pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-armoury: add support for GU605CR

On 12/29/25 14:09, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Dec 2025, Denis Benato wrote:
>
>> Add TDP data for laptop model GU605CR.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Denis Benato <denis.benato@...ux.dev>
> Hi Denis,
>
> I've applied these 4 to the review-ilpo-fixes branch, but next time please 
> please make them a series instead of sending 4 very similar ID addition 
> changes to the same file independently.
>
> A series is easier for me to apply as a whole than 4 patches individually. 
> Also, series won't cause some messy misapplication as easily as individual 
> patches that can be applied in order different from what was used by the 
> submitter to create them (it seems there were no context conflicts with 
> these but I had to check that == extra work for me).
>
Hi,

Thank you, I'll keep this in mind.