linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 9/9] bpf,x86: Use single ftrace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251229110337.030232e0@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 11:03:37 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...nel.org>, Florent Revest <revest@...gle.com>,
 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko
 <andrii@...nel.org>, Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>, Song Liu
 <song@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 9/9] bpf,x86: Use single ftrace_ops for
 direct calls

On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 16:22:18 +0100
Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com> wrote:

> actualy, it seems that having it the original way with adding the rest
> of the wrappers for !CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS case is
> easier AFAICS

I'm fine either way.

-- Steve