lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aVLDuUAHw0egvFfr@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 08:08:57 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@...edance.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, bvanassche@....org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
	alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Avoid work_on_cpu() in async probe workers

On Sat, Dec 27, 2025 at 07:33:26PM +0800, Jinhui Guo wrote:
> To fix the issue, pci_call_probe() must not call work_on_cpu() when it is
> already running inside an unbounded asynchronous worker. Because a driver
> can be probed asynchronously either by probe_type or by the kernel command
> line, we cannot rely on PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS alone. Instead, we test
> the PF_WQ_WORKER flag in current->flags; if it is set, pci_call_probe() is
> executing within an unbounded workqueue worker and should skip the extra
> work_on_cpu() call.

Why not just use queue_work_on() on system_dfl_wq (or any other unbound
workqueue)? Those are soft-affine to cache domain but can overflow to other
CPUs?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ