[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <868qel9fje.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 21:52:37 +0100
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>, Mike
Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kho: simplify page initialization in kho_restore_page()
On Tue, Dec 23 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 5:45 AM Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> When restoring a page (from kho_restore_pages()) or folio (from
>> kho_restore_folio()), KHO must initialize the struct page. The
>> initialization differs slightly depending on if a folio is requested or
>> a set of 0-order pages is requested.
>>
>> Conceptually, it is quite simple to understand. When restoring 0-order
>> pages, each page gets a refcount of 1 and that's it. When restoring a
>> folio, head page gets a refcount of 1 and tail pages get 0.
>>
>> kho_restore_page() tries to combine the two separate initialization flow
>> into one piece of code. While it works fine, it is more complicated to
>> read than it needs to be. Make the code simpler by splitting the two
>> initalization paths into two separate functions. This improves
>> readability by clearly showing how each type must be initialized.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>> This patch is a follow up from
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/86ms42mj44.fsf@kernel.org/
>>
>> kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
>> index 2d9ce33c63dc..304c26fd5ee6 100644
>> --- a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
>> +++ b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
>> @@ -219,11 +219,33 @@ static int __kho_preserve_order(struct kho_mem_track *track, unsigned long pfn,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +/* For physically contiguous 0-order pages. */
>> +static void kho_init_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int nr_pages)
>
> Here and in other places below, it is better for nr_pages to be
> unsigned long. This is consistent with other places in mm, where we
> have gradually moved on from int/unsigned int to unsigned long for
> npages (see gup.c for example). Otherwise, LGTM.
Thanks. Will do.
[...]
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists