[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251229210355.65732-1-whrosenb@asu.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 14:03:55 -0700
From: Will Rosenberg <whrosenb@....edu>
To:
Cc: Will Rosenberg <whrosenb@....edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org (open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM)
Subject: [PATCH] perf: Fix refcount warning on event->mmap_count increment
When calling refcount_inc(&event->mmap_count) inside perf_mmap_rb(), the
following warning is triggered:
refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
WARNING: lib/refcount.c:25
PoC:
struct perf_event_attr attr = {0};
int fd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
mmap(NULL, 0x3000, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
int victim = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, 0, -1, fd,
PERF_FLAG_FD_OUTPUT);
mmap(NULL, 0x3000, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, victim, 0);
This occurs when creating a group member event with the flag
PERF_FLAG_FD_OUTPUT. The group leader should be mmap-ed and then mmap-ing
the event triggers the warning.
Since the event has copied the output_event in perf_event_set_output(),
event->rb is set. As a result, perf_mmap_rb() calls
refcount_inc(&event->mmap_count) when event->mmap_count = 0.
Account for the case when event->mmap_count = 0. This patch goes against
the design philosophy of the refcount library by re-enabling an empty
refcount, but the patch remains inline with the current treatment of
mmap_count.
Signed-off-by: Will Rosenberg <whrosenb@....edu>
---
Notes:
I also have a related concern about code that handles the mmap_count.
In perf_mmap_close(), if refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock() decrements
event->mmap_count to zero, then event->rb is set to NULL. This
effectively undos our output_event copy. However, is this desired
behavior? Should event->rb remain unchanged since it may still be
mmap-ed by other events and can still be used?
kernel/events/core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 376fb07d869b..49709b627b1f 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -7279,7 +7279,8 @@ static int perf_mmap_rb(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct perf_event *event,
* multiple times.
*/
perf_mmap_account(vma, user_extra, extra);
- refcount_inc(&event->mmap_count);
+ if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&event->mmap_count))
+ refcount_set(&event->mmap_count, 1);
return 0;
}
base-commit: 538254cd98afb31b09c4cc58219217d8127c79be
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists