linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] Eliminate Dying Memory Cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7ia4tsx7ocew.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 22:03:19 +0000
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...a.com>,  Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,  Zi
 Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,  Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@...ux.dev>,  hannes@...xchg.org,
  hughd@...gle.com,  mhocko@...e.com,  muchun.song@...ux.dev,
  david@...nel.org,  lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,  harry.yoo@...cle.com,
  imran.f.khan@...cle.com,  kamalesh.babulal@...cle.com,
  axelrasmussen@...gle.com,  yuanchu@...gle.com,  weixugc@...gle.com,
  chenridong@...weicloud.com,  mkoutny@...e.com,
  akpm@...ux-foundation.org,  hamzamahfooz@...ux.microsoft.com,
  apais@...ux.microsoft.com,  lance.yang@...ux.dev,  linux-mm@...ck.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,  cgroups@...r.kernel.org,  Qi Zheng
 <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,  Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] Eliminate Dying Memory Cgroup

Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> writes:

> On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 02:18:51PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
>> >>>> I just think you should do a preliminary review of the AI review results
>> >>>> instead of sending them out directly. Otherwise, if everyone does this,
>> >>>> the community will be full of bots.
>> 
>> I do think it's awkward to dump the whole review output for the patch
>> series in a single message.  It looks like there's a sudden jump to
>> XML?
>> It's better to reply to the individual patches with the comments
>> inline, which I think is where Roman is trying to go long term.
>
> I don't know what Roman's trying to do long-term, but his email
> that started this thread was so badly written that it was offensive.
> Had it been sent to me, I would have responded in the style of Arkell
> v Pressdram.

It felt awkward to send a bunch of emails from myself, all beginning
with the "I ran the ai review and here is the output" header.
Once we have a bot, obviously it's better to answer individual emails,
as the bpf subsystem does.