[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aVNOYuC0-lcymn-P@pie>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 04:00:34 +0000
From: Yao Zi <me@...ao.cc>
To: Alex Elder <elder@...cstar.com>, Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Guodong Xu <guodong@...cstar.com>, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, spacemit@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] clk: spacemit: extract common ccu functions
On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 06:50:14PM -0600, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 12/26/25 12:55 AM, Yixun Lan wrote:
> > Refactor the probe function of SpacemiT's clock, and extract a common ccu
> > file, so new clock driver added in the future can share the same code,
> > which would lower the burden of maintenance. Since this commit changes the
> > module name where the auxiliary device registered, the auxiliary device id
> > need to be adjusted. Idea of the patch is come from review of K3 clock
> > driver, please refer this disucssion [1].
>
> I understand the point here, and it's just like the first patch:
> you're extracting generic code out of the K1-specific file so a
> new K3-specific source file can use it too. This is really good.
>
> However the end result should incorporate *only* generic code
> in the generic file, and have the SoC-specific source files
> contain everything else.
>
> But as you have it now, the (new) generic probe function
> contains special handling for "spacemit,k1-pll", and that's
> not generic.
>
> So I suggest you still implement k1_ccu_probe() (and k3_ccu_probe())
> separately, allowing each of them to do platform-specific things
> before (and/or after) calling the generic probe function.
I've raised similar concerns in the series for K3 clock tree[1].
Regards,
Yao Zi
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aU50DIe9qMneb0GT@pie/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists