[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ecoc7gnp.fsf@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 20:11:22 -0800
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
Cc: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@...ux.dev>, hannes@...xchg.org, hughd@...gle.com,
mhocko@...e.com, muchun.song@...ux.dev, david@...nel.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, ziy@...dia.com, harry.yoo@...cle.com,
imran.f.khan@...cle.com, kamalesh.babulal@...cle.com,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com, yuanchu@...gle.com, weixugc@...gle.com,
chenridong@...weicloud.com, mkoutny@...e.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hamzamahfooz@...ux.microsoft.com,
apais@...ux.microsoft.com, lance.yang@...ux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Qi Zheng
<zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] Eliminate Dying Memory Cgroup
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 01:36:12AM +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>> Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@...ux.dev> writes:
>>
>> Hey!
>>
>> I ran this patchset through AI review and it found few regression (which
>> can of course be false positives). When you'll have time, can you,
>> please, take a look and comment on which are real and which are not?
>>
>> Thank you!
>
> Hi Roman, this is really good. I assume this is Gemini model. I see BPF
> and networking folks have automated the AI review process which is
> really good. I think MM should also adopt that model. Are you looking
> into automating MM review bot?
Yes, absolutely. We're working on it, hopefully in January/February we
can have something reasonably solid.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists