[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b367446-2248-4936-99b6-e9ee93298eb5@huawei-partners.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 12:02:31 +0300
From: Gutierrez Asier <gutierrez.asier@...wei-partners.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <damon@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, <artem.kuzin@...wei.com>,
<stepanov.anatoly@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] mm: improve call_controls_lock
On 12/29/2025 6:22 PM, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hello Asier,
Hi SeongJae,
>
> Thank you for sending this patch!
>
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2025 14:55:32 +0000 Asier Gutierrez <gutierrez.asier@...wei-partners.com> wrote:
>
>> This is a minor patch set for a call_controls_lock synchronization improvement.
>
> Please break description lines to not exceed 75 characters per line.
>
>>
>> Spinlocks are faster than mutexes, even when the mutex takes the fast
>> path. Hence, this patch replaces the mutex call_controls_lock with a spinlock.
>
> But call_controls_lock is not being used on performance critical part.
> Actually, most of DAMON code is not performance critical. I really appreciate
> your patch, but I have to say I don't think this change is really needed now.
> Please let me know if I'm missing something.
I was just reviewing the code and I noticed this. Yes, you are right, the performance
is not critical.
>>
>> Initial benchmarking shows the following results
>>
>>
>> # bpftrace -e 'kprobe:kdamond_call { @start[tid] = nsecs; }
>
> Commit log shouldn't start with '#'. Please consider indenting the above
> command and below outputs of it.
>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
> [...]
>
Thanks a lot for the review!
--
Asier Gutierrez
Huawei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists