[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df617237-3b07-47b9-89b1-9b43ed332d03@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 11:40:32 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: Document TI TPS65185
On 30/12/2025 10:49, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 10:08:57 +0100
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 27, 2025 at 11:20:36AM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
>>> Document the TPS65185. GPIO names are same as in the datasheet except for
>>> the PWRUP pad which is described as "enable". That pin is optional because
>>> the rising edge corresponds to setting one register bit and falling edge
>>> to another register bit.
>>
>> Nothing improved in the subject. Mark asked for proper prefix and you
>> used exactly the same prefix, so the same problem stays.
>>
> Quoting:
> The Documentation/ and include/dt-bindings/ portion of the patch should be a separate patch. The preferred subject prefix for binding patches is:
> "dt-bindings: <binding dir>: ..."
>
> That looks like what I am using.
Please read entire paragraph not just half of it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists