lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251230110441.1205454-1-zilin@seu.edu.cn>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 11:04:41 +0000
From: Zilin Guan <zilin@....edu.cn>
To: markus.elfring@....de
Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	jianhao.xu@....edu.cn,
	johannes@...solutions.net,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
	zilin@....edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: wwan: iosm: Fix memory leak in ipc_mux_deinit()

On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 10:42:22AM+0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> Do you tend to interpret such information still as the beginning
> of the function implementation?
> ...
> Would the mentioned variable be relevant only for an additional if branch?

I prefer to strictly follow the existing coding style of the current file, 
where all local variables are declared at the top of the function. I do 
not wish to mix different declaration styles in this patch.

If you believe the file should be converted to C99 style, that would be 
better handled in a separate cleanup patch for the entire file, rather 
than mixing it into this bug fix.

Regards,
Zilin Guan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ