lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251230-kagu-of-scientific-enrichment-6fcd4c@quoll>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:32:38 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Akhila YS <akhilayalmati@...il.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, 
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mtd: microchip,mchp23k256: convert to DT
 schema

On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 12:49:00PM +0000, Akhila YS wrote:
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/microchip,mchp23k256.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Microchip 23K256 (and similar) SPI SRAM MTD driver

driver? Bindings are for hardware.

> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> +
> +description: |

Do not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting.

> +  Driver for Microchip 23K256 and compatible (e.g. 23LCV1024) serial SRAM devices

Don't describe drivers...

> +  accessed via SPI. The device exposes the SRAM as an MTD device and supports
> +  optional partitioning via child nodes.

nor DTS, but the hardware.

> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: /schemas/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml#
> +

If this is SRAM, then it should go to sram directory. But maybe it is
MTD, so NOR or NAND? If so you would be missing here refs to NAND
chips.

Although docs are saying it is SRAM, so just place it there.

> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - microchip,mchp23k256
> +      - microchip,mchp23lcv1024
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  "#address-cells":
> +    const: 1
> +
> +  "#size-cells":
> +    const: 1

Pretty incomplete. Old binding and above cells claim there can be child
nodes, so please add them and test. Works? No. Shall work? Yes... so
either old binding was incorrect or new binding is incomplete. I did not
check the driver, though.

> +
> +required:
> +  - reg
> +  - compatible
> +  - "#address-cells"
> +  - "#size-cells"
> +  - spi-max-frequency
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    spi {
> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> +        #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +        sram@0 {
> +            #address-cells = <1>;
> +            #size-cells = <1>;

They are redundant. Where are children?

> +            compatible = "microchip,mchp23k256";
> +            reg = <0>;
> +            spi-max-frequency = <20000000>;
> +        };
> +    };
> +...
> 
> ---
> base-commit: cc3aa43b44bdb43dfbac0fcb51c56594a11338a8
> change-id: 20251229-nxp-526e29da9f29
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Akhila YS <akhilayalmati@...il.com>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ