[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51825dee-c2c9-4d94-b741-ffdc2fbfa773@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 16:35:27 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...ladev.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Fedor Ross <fedor.ross@....com>,
Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Markus Heidelberg <m.heidelberg@....de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: imx8mn: Add ifm VHIP4 EvalBoard v1
and v2
On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 02:34:14PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 12/30/25 11:46 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > +&fec1 {
> > > + fsl,magic-packet;
> >
> > Upps, i probably cut out too much context. This FEC is connected to the Ethernet switch.
> >
> > WoL for a port connected to a switch? Have you tested this? Normally
> > you would have WoL on each port of the switch, and not on the conduit
> > interface.
> >
> > > +&fec1 {
> > > + fsl,magic-packet;
> >
> > Have you tested WoL?
> >
> > > +&fec1 {
> > > + fsl,magic-packet;
> >
> > WoL again?
> I don't think WOL is used on this device at all. Would you suggest removing
> the fsl,magic-packet properties ?
Yes.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists