[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251230211347.4099600-5-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:13:43 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>, Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] KVM: SVM: Filter out 64-bit exit codes when invoking
exit handlers on bare metal
Explicitly filter out 64-bit exit codes when invoking exit handlers, as
svm_exit_handlers[] will never be sized with entries that use bits 63:32.
Processing the non-failing exit code as a 32-bit value will allow tracking
exit_code as a single 64-bit value (which it is, architecturally). This
will also allow hardening KVM against Spectre-like attacks without needing
to do silly things to avoid build failures on 32-bit kernels
(array_index_nospec() rightly asserts that the index fits in an "unsigned
long").
Omit the check when running as a VM, as KVM has historically failed to set
bits 63:32 appropriately when synthesizing VM-Exits, i.e. KVM could get
false positives when running as a VM on an older, broken KVM/kernel. From
a functional perspective, omitting the check is "fine", as any unwanted
collision between e.g. VMEXIT_INVALID and a 32-bit exit code will be
fatal to KVM-on-KVM regardless of what KVM-as-L1 does.
Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index e24bedf1fc81..1ffe922e95fd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -3443,8 +3443,22 @@ static void dump_vmcb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
sev_free_decrypted_vmsa(vcpu, save);
}
-int svm_invoke_exit_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 exit_code)
+int svm_invoke_exit_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __exit_code)
{
+ u32 exit_code = __exit_code;
+
+ /*
+ * SVM uses negative values, i.e. 64-bit values, to indicate that VMRUN
+ * failed. Report all such errors to userspace (note, VMEXIT_INVALID,
+ * a.k.a. SVM_EXIT_ERR, is special cased by svm_handle_exit()). Skip
+ * the check when running as a VM, as KVM has historically left garbage
+ * in bits 63:32, i.e. running KVM-on-KVM would hit false positives if
+ * the underlying kernel is buggy.
+ */
+ if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR) &&
+ (u64)exit_code != __exit_code)
+ goto unexpected_vmexit;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE
if (exit_code == SVM_EXIT_MSR)
return msr_interception(vcpu);
@@ -3471,7 +3485,7 @@ int svm_invoke_exit_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 exit_code)
unexpected_vmexit:
dump_vmcb(vcpu);
- kvm_prepare_unexpected_reason_exit(vcpu, exit_code);
+ kvm_prepare_unexpected_reason_exit(vcpu, __exit_code);
return 0;
}
--
2.52.0.351.gbe84eed79e-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists